Friday 30 March 2018

Frame-Sentence Language Comparison

Frame-Sentence Language
Comparison



1 Frame and quantum are two parts of language.
2 Frame is duplicable and quantum is not duplicable.
3 Period of being quantum is from what quantum starts as generating sentence till what quantum stops as sentence ending.
4 Dualism of language indicated by KARCEVSKIJ is caused by frame-quantum structure.
5 Frame is enlarged to language nucleus.
6 Language nucleus can reply to the outside, but can not make the new situation of conversation. For instance, “By the way, go to cinema tomorrow, OK?”
7 For the perfect use of language, language nucleus must be integrated to integrated nucleus that orders language to carry out the conversation needed in the new situation.  .
8 Language is a lower position until the rank of replying.
9 Language is similar to a chess game considering the next move.     
10 The result of integrated nucleus having the new additional information generated by the plural frame is reduced to the frame of integrated nucleus. The situation is called <integrated reframe>, abbreviated to <IRF>.
11 Integrated reframe is a enlarged language.
12 Integrated reframe has different information sources from different frames.
13 Integrated reframe can compare the results of different information of different frames.
14 Comparison of different frame’s situation can make the new consequence of order to language nucleus by integrated order, abbreviated to <IO>.
15 For instance, integrated reframe gathers the next information. [I am fine today] [I want to go out now] [I hear that a new cinema is coming in the city]
  Comparison works between /I/ /fine/ /today/ /go out/ /now/ /hear/ /a new cinema/ /coming/ /the city/ and so forth.
16 Integrated order works and the new sentence is generated in integrated frame by complex of quanta group of different frames.
  For instance, gathered information, [I am fine today and want to go out and hear a new cinema coming]
  The new sentence, [I will go out to see a cinema]
  The new quanta, <will> comes from <want>, and <to> comes from <fine> <go out>.
  Transformation and alteration of word and quantum are technological details that will be seen by other papers.
17 The concept of integration is suggested by the work of NASH John.


Tokyo December 10, 2005


No comments:

Post a Comment