Saturday 31 August 2019

Of John Donne's For Whom the Bell Tolls Note and Note 2 added

Of John Donne's For Whom the Bell Tolls
Note added

John Donne

For Whom the Bell Tolls

On 5 August 2019, we went to see the film Wim Wenders' Submergence 2017 at kino cinema, Tachikawa. Tokyo.

In the film, the sea and the rocks are frequently appeared as if all were born from those.
At the couple's conversation, John Donne's poem, For Whom the Bell Tolls is quoted.

No man is an ireland,
Entire of itself.
Each is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thine own
Or of thine friend's were.
Each man's death diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.

Tokyo
7 August 2019
SRFL Paper

[Note]

31 August 2019

In summer 2013, I wrote a Haiku at my blog as the next.

This haiku was dedicated to John Donne.

I perfectly forgot this.

Yesterday I chanced to read the past blog and remembered the day.

when I was making a woodwork in the garden and heard the bell tolled from the Buddhist temple.

So I recalled the famous Donne's poem, For Whom the Bell Tolls.

----------------------------------------------------

Haiku for summer’s end

Posted on August 27, 2013

For John Donne

TANAKA Akio

Kanashimi ha
Kieyuku Kane he
Natsu owaru

<Translation>
Sadness has gone
To the bell melts away
Summer is ending

Tokyo
27 August 2013
atbankofdam

----------------------------------------------

[Note 2]

31 August 2019

Haiku for summer's end was written for my high school days' best friend KANEKO Yutaka who was suddenly dead age 50s. I ever wrote his memory titled To my dear friend, KANEKO Yutaka in 2013.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To my dear friend, KANEKO Yutaka

TANAKA Akio

We were always sitting at the right end of the classroom, where the seats were near the entrance from the corridor, so classmates entered the room with rattling noises. But we liked the seats rather satisfying. We were G class of the third year of the high school, which class was all hoped to go universities of the mathematical or science fields.

The seats were free to sit but almost determined by the personalities. Serious were sitting at the comparatively before widows sites. The seats were silent and easy to concentrate. We were also serious to the learning but liked the most bad seats that could not concentrate by the various noises for entering and out-going to the room. But we loved the seats.

KANEKO Yutaka and I first met at this class and became best friend. He probably hoped to go to chemistry and I was physics. He was very good at mathematics and I was ordinary at math. I sometimes asked him how to solve the hard quests of math. At that time he smiled to me and said, " there's any little paper? The problem can be written enough by such a little space."

Over the our seats, frequently flew to the end of the class where the trash can was set always filled with the calculate-papers for math and writing of English. The members of the class all were eager to solve math quests for preparing to entrance examinations to the universities. At the result they threw the used papers over us to the can. So around the can, the scraps were littered with. I was never tidy but I was the nearest one to the can, so I sometimes went to trash dump to clean the can.

After we graduated the high school, he studied chemistry as planned at university. But I selected language study, not physics. I also liked philosophical or linguistic fields for their long historical heritages. What I returned to the field related with physics was already over the year 30s. My research object was narrowed to language universals using mathematical writing or physical approach.

After half a century, he died by disease in his researching way. I have learnt same theme on language using maths way not solving any quest from 1920s' Linguistic Circle of Prague. I dream that over my head still now vain calculate-papers are being thrown to the can behind us. If I ask him to help me for solving, he will say to me wanting tiny paper to write the answer concisely with his dear smiling as ever.

References
1. Language, amalgamation of mathematics and physics / 13 May 2013   2. Clifford Algebra A trial for amalgamation of mathematics and physics / 20 April 2014
3. Reversion Conjecture Revised /1 May 2014


Tokyo
22 May 2013 Text written
20 April 2014 Reference added

8 August 2014 Reference added

31 August 2019 Text revised

  Sekinan Research Field of Language

Of John Donne's For Whom the Bell Tolls Note added

Of John Donne's For Whom the Bell Tolls
Note added

John Donne

[Note]

31 August 2019

In summer 2013, I wrote a Haiku at my blog as the next.
This haiku was dedicated to John Donne.
I perfectly forgot this.
Yesterday I chanced to read the past blog and remembered the day.
when I was making a woodwork in the garden and heard the bell tolled from the Buddhist temple.
So I recalled the famous Donne's poem, For Whom the Bell Tolls.

----------------------------------------------------

Haiku for summer’s end

Posted on August 27, 2013

For John Donne

TANAKA Akio

Kanashimi ha
Kieyuku Kane he
Natsu owaru

<Translation>
Sadness has gone
To the bell melts away
Summer is ending

Tokyo
27 August 2013
atbankofdam

----------------------------------------------

Friday 30 August 2019

Meaning minimum On Roman Jakobson, Sergej Karcevskij and CHINO Eiichi 2013

Posted on August 29, 2013

Meaning minimum
On Roman Jakobson, Sergej Karcevskij and CHINO Eiichi

TANAKA Akio
ifbetrue
6 April 2013

1.
Meaning minimum is one of the kernel concepts for the model of language universals on my study. The concept was at first thought from Roman Jakobson’s semantic minimum on which I first read at his book, ESSAIS DE LINGUISTIQUE GÉNÉRALE, 1973.　His concept was yet intuitive at the linguistic study history in the latter half of the 20 th century.Comparison with his concept, my definition of meaning minimum was a certain basis prepared in the learning of mathematics, especially on algebraic geometry, that is the most fantastic approach to the construction of the language model. But the contents of meaning minimum is vacant. This concept shows the minimum unit of one big constructive meaning of word. meaning minimum seems to be correspondent with element of set theory, which theory and foundations of mathematics had been my favourite mathematical basis in 1970s, my youth time. Bourbaki was always echoed around us. Grothendieck was a highest star in this world.
2.
Time went vast from at that time. Set theory became one of the premise field of mathematics. But in my part, set theory’s agenda was put at a another point. Because language has a certain expanded world that seems to be continuous. Set theory’s atomic discreteness does not match in my primary learning level. So, in my age 30s, I had sank in the philosophically intuitive thinking often referring the tradition of 1920s, especially of the Linguistic Circle of Prague. On the circle my teacher CHINO Eiichi had taught me from time to time on the campus of university or coffee shop near the station we used. CHINO had gone to the Czechoslovakia Republic from 1959 to 1967. I first met him in 1969 at his Russian class at my third year of university student. I was the age 21 and he was 37.
3.
At the age 23’s 1971 spring, I graduated university and once became a high school’s teacher and again returned back to university in 1979 after 8 year job of the school. At that time I thought of characters’ distinctive features on Written Chinese classics. I mainly read WANG Guowei, ZHANG Binglin, DUAN Yucai, WANG yinzhi guiding by Japanese modern scholar KANO Naoki. Expressly I had attracted to WANG guowei and his book Guantangjilin. Besides reading these China’s Qing dynasty’s linguistic peaks, I had always thought on Ludwig Wittgenstein for his endless pursuit on language. So I resigned school and came back to the campus where I again met with CHINO. I was age 30s and he was 50s. He was already the big scholar at the linguistic field but I was a poor return student. But I dare to say we were colleagues for language study. He taught me the detailed and strict tradition of the linguistic Circle of Prague. He frequently talked on Sergej Karcevskij and his eminent discernment on language. In the later year’s masterpiece, Janua Linguisticae Reserata, 1994, he wrote only Karcevskij as genius in the great linguists.
4.
Being led by CHINO, I again started linguistic learning on meaning that I had been interested in from my 20s but too hard to approach by my talent. This time I had Karcevskij’s fine insight to meaning enough absorbing the fertile tradition of Prague, where also exist Jakobson and Mathesius. Through the learning I gradually lean to desire to write clear definitions on language. I again remembered the little learning of my 20s age’s mathematics. Bourbaki, Godel, TAKEUCHI and their set theory, foundations of mathematics and that Incompleteness theorem. I had learnt mathematics little by little, inch by inch.
5.
CHINO Died in 2002 at age 70 and I became 55. The next year 2003, I wrote a short paper titled “Quantum Theory for Language”. This paper was showed at a international symposium on Silk road for dealing with language from Chinese characters on linguistic viewpoint. I knew that Asian civilisation and history had great concern not only from Asia but also European continents. At the symposium some 400 researchers gathered in the various scholarly fields. It was a awesome encounter for my study, namely, East meet West. Probably Chinese character’s agenda will be written by Europe oriented mathematics. WANG Guowei will meet with karcevskij mediated through mathematics’ description. The target confronted at that time was time inherent in characters, or time in word. In Chinese, particularly in classical written Chinese, all the characters show enough independent meaning in one character probably including even time. It was my first conjecture taught from Karcevskij and CHINO. Meaning minimum is on the boat going across to the opposite shore. This metaphor was derived from WANG Guowei’s famous paper, “Yin- bu zhong suojian xiangong xianwang kao”
6.
The concept of time inevitably led to the distance of distance. In 2004, I wrote a paper titled “Distance Theory”. But the paper was yet intuitive and not clear for descriptive definition. So hereinafter I learnt algebra inch by inch assisting with the rich imagine of geometry. In the centre of learning, always exist time that connotes finiteness and infinity. But infinity is not easily obtained without probably only loop space at the present. And again returns back to meaning minimum as the passenger of the boat named time property inherent. This time the passenger on the boat is called operad or algebraic language.
7.
After all I came back to the very dream that I had embraced since the high school days. It was a fundamental ask on language related with mathematics and physics. The root of language would be able to describe by mathematics and physics. In my mind language is always put at the centre of the pursuit that was what anyone can clearly understand. Description by mathematics, but physics why. Physics treats with substance that constructs the world in which I had desire to let language enter. Substantial language. It was my dream and will be hereafter.

References
1.
<Meaning minimum>
Cell Theory Continuation of Quantum Theory for Language / From Cell to Manifold For LEIBNIZ and JAKOBSON / Tokyo June 2, 2007
<Bourbaki>
The Time of Language Ode to The Early Bourbaki To Grothendieck / January 10, 2012
2.
<CHINO Eiichi>
Fortuitous Meeting What CHINO Eiichi Taught Me in the CLass of Linguistics / Tokyo December 5, 2004
<The Linguistic Circle of Prague>
Linguistic Circle of Prague / Tokyo 13 July 2012, 19 July 2012 Added
3.
<WANG Guowei>
The Complete Works of WANG Guowei / Tokyo 24 May 2012
<Ludwig Wittgenstein>
The Time of Wittgenstein / Tokyo January 20, 2012
<Sergej Karcevskij>
Notes for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej / Note for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej’s “Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique” / Tokyo September 8, 2011
4.
<Set Theory>
Quantum Linguistics / Growth of Word Dedicated to TAKEUCHI Gaishi / Tokyo January 30, 2006
5.
<Quantum Theory for Language>
Quantum Theory for Language Synopsis / Tokyo January 15, 2004
<Time inherent in characters>
On Time Property Inherent in Characters / Hakuba March 28, 2003
6.
<Distance>
Distance Theory / Tokyo May 5, 2004<Meaning minimum and distance>
sekinanlogos / Floer Homology Language / Supersymmetric Harmonic Oscillator / Tokyo May 6, 2009
<Loop space>
sekinanmodel / Infinite Loop Space Language / Word as Infinite Loop Space / 6 December 2012
<Operad>
ifbetruezoho / Operad Meaning Theory / From Cell to Operad / 4 March 2013
7.
<Description>
sekinanmetria / Notes for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej / Description of Language / September 9, 2011
<Substantiality>
sekinanlogos / Floer Homology Language / Potential of Language / Tokyo June 16, 2009
<Amalgamation>
Language, amalgamation of mathematics and physics / ifbetrue 2 April 2013

# Here ends the paper.

Non-symmetry, 1920s’ Prague and Sergej Karcevskij’s “Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique”

Posted on May 19, 2015

Non-symmetry, 1920s’ Prague and Sergej Karcevskij’s “Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique”
From Print 2012, Chapter 18

非対称性。Non-symmetry. それはかつてＣと繰り返し話した内容だ。It was the very theme that I repeatedly talked on with C.１９２０年代のプラハ。Prague in 1920s. 雑誌TCLPに載ったカルツェフスキイの論文、「言語記号の非対称的二重性」。Karcevskij’s paper “Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique” that appeared in the magazine TCLP. 言語が保持し続けるところの、それによって言語が言語であり続けるところの、絶対的に矛盾する柔構造と硬構造の共存。Absolutely contradicted coexistence between flexibility and solidity, which language keeps on maintaining, by which language continues existing as language. 言語において二重に内在し続けるだろう永遠の矛盾。Still now there will exist the everlasting dual contradiction in language.言語がかくも柔軟でかくも堅固でいられるのはなぜか。Why can language stay in such solid and such flexible condition like that. そのほとんど絶対的に矛盾するかともおもわれる二重性をカルツェフスキイは提示した。Karcevskij proposed the duality that is seemed to be almost absolute contradiction. Ｃがその最後の本の中でただ一人天才と称した言語学者、セルゲイ・カルツェフスキイが残した白眉の論考。Sergej Karcevskij’s best of papers, for whom C called as the only genius in his last book.

Gift from Sergej Karcevskij

Posted on May 19, 2015

TANAKA Akio
1.
Is language variable? If so, where is substance of variability?
2.
Variability occurs in substance.
3.
What is not substance is untrue in variability.
4.
Where is substance of language?
5.
Letters are substance. Pronunciations are substance. Meanings are substance?
6.
Meanings occurs in inner human being.
7.
The sun rises in the east. It is true. The sun also rises. It is true in Hemingway.
8.
Meaning is variable.
9.
At where occurs variability of meaning?
10.
If variability of meaning is true, substance in which variability occurs must be shown in front of us.

Tokyo
October 23, 2005
Sekinan Research Field of Language

Postscript [References January 1, 2008]
Substantiality / Tokyo February 27, 2005
Substantiality of Language / Tokyo February 21, 2006

Thursday 29 August 2019

Language Universal Models

Language Universal Models

Posted on May 19, 2015

1. Repeated Integral Model
1.1 Hyperbolic volume Volume of Language
1.2 Hyperbolic space Hyperbolic Space Language

2. Minimal Model
2.1 Free group　Notes for KARVESKIJ Sergej, “Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique”
2.2 Fundamental group Description of Language
2.3 de Rham complex Structure of Word
2.4 de Rham complex on spherical surface Condition of Meaning

3. Knot Theory Model
3.1 Hida deformation space Loop Time f Character

4. Jones-Witten Theory Model
4.1 Witten invariant Symmetry of Language

5. Moduli Model
5.1 Projective algebraic manifold Completion of Language
5.2 Projective algebraic manifold Meaning Minimum of Language

6. Arithmetic Geometry Model
6.1 Riemann-Roch Formula Language, Word, Distance, Meaning and Meaning Minimum

7. Projective Space Model
7.1 Grothendieck theorem Vector Bundle Model

8. Diophantine Approximation Model-Diophantine Language
8.1 Faltings theorem Finiteness of Words
8.2 Noguchi, Winkelmann theorem Dimension of Words

Tokyo
January 25, 2012
February 1, 2012 Added
Sekinan Research Field of Language

Guarantee of Language For LÉVI-STRAUSS Claude

Guarantee of Language

For LÉVI-STRAUSS Claude

TANAKA Akio

A quantum originally stands close to the real world.

A quantum has a meaning.

A meaning of quantum is a pointing movement to the thing that is in the real world.

This movement of quantum guarantees the trust of language.

When two or over two quanta exist, connecting rule and separating rules work.

Connecting rule works in the situation what two or over two quanta stand in line from shorter time to longer time.

Separating rule works in the situation what two or over two quanta stand in line from longer to shorter.

Longer time quantum is stronger than the shorter one by the Distance theory.

Longer time quantum is near the real world than shorter time quantum.

Because longer one’ meaning is near the real world than shorter one’ meaning.

Therefore longer time quantum can get the nearer seat on the orbit.

Quanta are on a same orbit in which connecting rule works.

Quanta are on different orbits in each which separating rule works.

Connecting rule makes a word.

Separating rule makes a sentence.

Quanta on a same orbit are connecting by energy of the front quantum.

Energy of a quantum is derived from the quantum’s tendency of unification toward the real world.

Quanta on different orbits are separating.

But orbits are connecting by the energy of a negative quantum that can change a positive quantum to a new orbit.

Positive quantum has a notion.

Negative quantum has a function.

About positive and negative, for details see <Quantification of Quantum>.

When quanta are on an orbit, the front one takes energy out and connect the rear one.

When quanta change the orbit, the last negative quantum takes energy out and connects the different orbits.

A quantum stops on the nearest point to the real world.

This situation is called the end of a sentence.

As a result, a sentence is guaranteed by standing at most nearly along the things that exist in the real world.

Language that is a set of sentences is guaranteed.

Tokyo June 12, 2004

Sekinan Research Field of Language

[Referential note June 5, 2009]

Reversibility of Language / Floer Homology Language Note 4 / Tokyo June, 2009

Place where Quantum of Language Exists

Place where Quantum of Language Exists

TANAKA Akio

1            Quantum of language is the smallest unit of language.
2            Quantum of language moves linearly on the floor of language.
3            Linear movement is the properties of quantum.
4            Floor of language is on the space of language.
5            The space of language is two dimensions.
6            Two dimensions are horizontal and vertical.
7            Horizontal movement makes word, #1
8            Vertical movement makes sentence. #1
9            The space of language is electrical digitized place.
10        Chinese /jiao shi/ means classroom in English.
11        /Jiao/ is a quantum of language.
12        /Shi/ is a quantum of language.
13        /Jiao shi/ is a word.
14        /Jiao/ sends a quantum to /shi/ quantum.
15        /Shi/ quantum receives a quantum from /jiao/ quantum.
16        What sends quantum is called positive.
17        What receives quantum is called negative.
18        Quantum has positive energy in original condition.
19        Quantum changes negative in the situation of quanta set.
20        Quantum change occurs in two situations in general.
21        One situation is what quanta stand side by side on a floor and neighboring quanta connect well. #2
22        The other situation is what quant change oneself by the non-use of quanta meaning in language history progress. #2
23        Word has a positive- negative construction.
24        Positive-negative construction occurs on a floor.
25        Sentence has a positive-positive construction.
26        Positive-positive construction occurs on different floors.
27        The latter quantum transfers on a different floor. This transfer is called <jump>.†
28        Quantum has electrical energy which flows to the electrical zero level.
29        Electrical zero level is a sentence end where quantum of language ideally accord with the real world. #3
30        A floor of language is a non-branches electrical circuit.
31        Word is a non-branch circuit.
32        Sentence is a branch circuit.
33        The meaning of word and sentence is a compound system of electrical signals.

#1 Definition of word and sentence can be seen in the paper “Method of Linguistics” and other papers on the site of Sekinan Research Field of Language /www.sekinan.org/.
#2 Definition of connect well can be seen in the paper of “Quantum Theory for Language Synopsis” and other papers on the site of SRFL.
#3 Definition of sentence end can be seen in the paper “Mirror Theory”, “Mirror Language” and other papers on the site of SRFL.

Tokyo July 18, 2004

Sekinan Research Field of Language

www.sekinan.org

Postscript
[Referential note November 9, 2007]
<Place where Quantum of Language Exists> is related with the next papers on the concept.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
<Distance Theory Algebraically Supplemented>

Brane Simplified Model <Continuation of Escalator Language> 2 Distance Tokyo October 26, 2007

____________________________________________________________________________________________

[Referential note February 9, 2008]
† Concept <jump> of /27/ is thinkable in connection with <quantum group’s parameter q> at the paper Kac-Moody Lie Algebra / Quantum Group /.
Refer to the next.