Letter to WPM and Sebastian on After Language Universals and Linguistics. 22 September 2021
Dear WPM ands Sebastian,
I wrote a next letter to WPM on 11 December 2019.
It was a clear farewell to Language Universals after some 20 year study of mine.
It also sends farewell to usual Linguistics now available at the study field.
For details, please refer to the next rather long letter.
After Language Universals, after Linguistics, to where language study go?
Simple answer is to mathematical and digital place.
Language Universals and Linguistics have not show any clear evidences and proofs, all are supposition that have been gathered narrow fields in the vast language world.
Simple answer is to mathematical and digital place.
Language Universals and Linguistics have not show any clear evidences and proofs, all are supposition that have been gathered narrow fields in the vast language world.
Mathematics has clear proof.
Digitisation has finite bounds.
Infinity and no bounds does not recognise by usual approach of human being, probably expect mathematics and computer.
Mathematics recognise infinite dimension.
Computer recognize infinite circuit.
Digitisation has finite bounds.
Infinity and no bounds does not recognise by usual approach of human being, probably expect mathematics and computer.
Mathematics recognise infinite dimension.
Computer recognize infinite circuit.
This upper two probably can surpass infinity.
Language is consisted of finite elements and can make infinite language world.
Human usual supposition cannot grasp this vast world.
Supposition is supposition, cannot go to Substantia (Substance), only can go to a part of Accsidens ( Accident).
Language is consisted of finite elements and can make infinite language world.
Human usual supposition cannot grasp this vast world.
Supposition is supposition, cannot go to Substantia (Substance), only can go to a part of Accsidens ( Accident).
Human being can use mathematics being kept from Greece and computer being made from modern scientific and technological result.
These two are reliable source that we take now, and can go some more near to Substantia of language.
These two are reliable source that we take now, and can go some more near to Substantia of language.
TANAKA Akio
Tokyo
3 September 2021
SRFL Paper
PS
Deeply thanks to WPM and Sebastian for your constant encouragement.
Deeply thanks to WPM and Sebastian for your constant encouragement.
PPS
My study's heart is geometry.
For its outline, refer to the next.
My study's heart is geometry.
For its outline, refer to the next.
..........................................................................................
Geometry Preparatory 1-7
Read more: https://srfl-collection.webnode.com/
..................................................................................................
PPS
22 September 2021
To WPM and Sebastian,
22 September 2021
To WPM and Sebastian,
For a new theory, now I think of Substantia and Accsidens.
The two are important technical terms from Greek philosophy to which I would like to attempt from a new perspective using geometric concept.
1.
What is substantia? It is the inside of boundary, outside is outer world.
Boundary is once defined through geometry.
Refer to the next.
The two are important technical terms from Greek philosophy to which I would like to attempt from a new perspective using geometric concept.
1.
What is substantia? It is the inside of boundary, outside is outer world.
Boundary is once defined through geometry.
Refer to the next.
- Boundary of Words 2009
Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/products/genealogical-tree-of-sekinans-paper-sixth-edition/
2.
What is accsidens? It is written in my papers related with Sergey Karcevskij's work.
Refer to the next.
Notes for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej, "Du Dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique" 2011
Description of Language 2011
Structure of Word 2011
Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/products/genealogical-tree-of-sekinans-paper-sixth-edition/
What is accsidens? It is written in my papers related with Sergey Karcevskij's work.
Refer to the next.
Notes for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej, "Du Dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique" 2011
Description of Language 2011
Structure of Word 2011
Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/products/genealogical-tree-of-sekinans-paper-sixth-edition/
3.
In a new theory, these two terms are played basic role.
In a new theory, these two terms are played basic role.
Nerve of human being has signal that is special language for human's body.
I would like to write this signal using geometrical numerical expression.
After writing, this signal will be translated to language understandable by human being.
I would like to write this signal using geometrical numerical expression.
After writing, this signal will be translated to language understandable by human being.
4.
The latest preparatory work for a new theory is shown at the next.
hat is signal? Total Edition 21 November 2018-23 April 2019
Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/what-is-signal-total-edition-21-november-2018-23-april-2019/
The latest preparatory work for a new theory is shown at the next.
hat is signal? Total Edition 21 November 2018-23 April 2019
Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/what-is-signal-total-edition-21-november-2018-23-april-2019/
Yours sincerely,
T.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment