Monday, 31 July 2017

Sekinan Library / STUDY Recent papers

2016 - 2017 Derived Category Language. 2016 Homology Language. 2017
Before 2016 Theory 2003 - 2016

For more details:


April 2017
Sayama Hills, Tokyo

Friday, 28 July 2017

Edward Sapir gave me a moment to study language universals together with Sergej Karcevskij

Edward Sapir gave me a moment to study language universals together with Sergej Karcevskij

TANAKA Akio


Edward Sapir's LANGUAGE AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF SPEECH 1921 gave me a moment for study in 1980s while I was roaming about the darkness of not- getting any aim to study on language. I ever wrote a short paper being influenced in 2005 and after also wrote a memo on his book in 2014.

Substantiality / 2005
Edward Sapir, Language, 1921 / 2014

A moment came from his famous concept drift. At the near-end Chapter 7 Sapir wrote "the three major drifts", that were the next.

"The drift toward the abolition of most case distinctions"
"the correlative drift toward position as an accompanied"
"the drift toward the invariable word"

This "the three major drifts" are all apparently seen in Chinese, especially in the classical written language. At my age 20s and 30s I continuously had read Qing dynasty's classical linguistic books and papers.  WANG Guowei, ZHANG Binglin, DUAN Yucai, WANGYyinzhi were the most reliable works for me.
Meaning minimum / 2013
The Time of WANG Guowei / 2011
The Days of Ideogram / 2017


This paper is unfinished

Tokyo
27 July - 28 July 2017
Sekinan Library

27 July 2017
The corns are ripening day by day.

Wednesday, 19 July 2017

Why is boundary necessary in language?

Why is boundary necessary in language?

q.v. Boundary of Words ​/ 12 February 2009

TANAKA Akio

1.
I have thought on language as a physic existence that has inevitably boundary to the outer world.
My question is simple and primitive. I ever wrote about the change of language - If there be change, there are exactly the situations before change and after change. Just where does changing substance exist? In the essay, rotten apple was used as the symbol of changing language.


Presupposition on Natural Language
TANAKA Akio
                                   
1.
Language is variable. If it be true, what is the base of variability?
2.
Language is pronounceable. If it be true, what is emerged by pronounced?
3.
Language is recordable. If it be true, what is emerged by recorded?
4.
Example.
An apple is variable and will be rotten by time proceeding.
An apple is pronounced at a glossary shop and will be bought by a home-maker.
An apple is recordable  and will be recorded in a photo.
5.
What distinguishes language from apple? The answer is uncertain. So I make the language models parting from natural language.

Reference
For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig / Position of Language / 10 December 2005-3 August 2012

                                                              Tokyo
                                                       22 August 2012
                                       Sekinan Research Field of Language

...................................................................................................................................................................


2.
Language's substantiality has been considered since I returned to the mathematical approach for learn language universals from the utterly beginning. In 2005 I wrote a tiny trial paper on the substantiality of language for thinking the study course hereafter.


Substantiality

Dedicated to SAPIR Edward

TANAKA Akio


1 Substance of language is completion which possesses the distance from the real world.
2 The distance is sustained by the fixation for which meaning and time are abstracted.
3 If language has not distance, language appears and disappears following the real world proceeding.
4 Language is substantially unchangeable. Changeability occurs on surrounding.
5 The distance is measured by the longitude from the real world to the substantiality that meaning and time possess.
6 Substantiality is a frame of language.
7 Substantiality is free from the real world.
8 Substantiality is powered by outer energy.
9 Powered substantiality moves complied with possessed command, namely meaning and time.
10 Powered moving substantiality of language is called <quantum>.
11 The idea of quantum is partially realized by <bar code system> in the supermarket or bookstore.
12 Substantiality is bar code of can or book. Outer energy is bar code reader. Quantum moves in a cash register. Language generates price addition in the real world.
13 Bar code is not language. Bar code is substantiality of language. Bar code does not move by itself. When bar code reader becomes energetic, bar code generates <quantum> in a cash register. Language, namely, price-additional-work, starts at bookstore of station front in the bustling evening. 

Tokyo February 27, 2005
For the Memory of Tanashi Station Front Street February 26, 2005
Sekinan Research Field of Language

...................................................................................................................................................................

3.
In 2013, I again wrote on the substantiality of language at the new level containing the determinate essence of language, dimension and  time.  The title is Macro Time and Micro Time. In this paper I thought that dimension is the essential factor of meaning, especially containingInfinitive meaning.


Macro Time and Micro Time


TANAKA Akio

24 July 2013
atbankofdam

1.
Through natural language, in human being, occurred the electrical signal by eye or ear. These complex situations are beyond this paper’s limits.
2.
Language is a physical object as signal and its transmission. At this circumstanstances, langauge must be recognised to be the existence that has finite time.
3.
An apple on the desk gradually becomes rotten by passing the time very after the crop in the orchard. #0
4.
Like an apple, language has passing physical time in oneself.
5.
Language is metamorphosed  by the time progressing.  #1
6.
Language includes the outer world from human being to universe. At this declaration, I recall Blaise Pascal’s Pensées. XXXIII. PROOFS OF JESUS CHRIST 308 The infinite distance between body and mind symbolizes the infinitely more infinite distance between mind and charity, for charity is supernatural.(Translated by A.J. Krailsheimer, 1966) #2
7.
Language’s time goes freely from the present to the future or the present to the past. #3
8.
Language symbolises the time from finiteness to infinity. #4
9.
Human being recognises this vast language world perfectly. #5

References
#0 For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig Position of Language / December 10, 2005 – August 3, 2012 / Sekinan Research Field of Language
#1 Time of Word / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory / January 1, 2009 / sekinanlogos
#2 PASCAL PENSÉES. Translated with an introduction by A.J. Krailsheimer. PENGUIN BOOKS 1966.
#3 Escalator language and Time For SHINRAN’s Idea and BOHDISATTVA / Escalator Language Theory / December 16, 2006 / Sekinan Research Field of Language
#4 From Finiteness to Infinity on Language / Topological Group Theory / February 1, 2009 / sekinanlogos
#5 Understandability of Language / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory /January 9, 2009 / sekinanlogos



...................................................................................................................................................................


4.
Boundary is related with dimension through  Poincaré Theorem. Details are next.


...................................................................................................................................................................

5.
Relation between boundary and synthesis in language is utterly unknown field for me. Study has just started from the entrance position. Recent results are the next.

Synthesis Conjecture

Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word 

TANAKA Akio

Synthesis 
 Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word 
29/09/2013 19:25
For synthesis of meaning in word,  Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word i s proposed by cohomological expression.

2  Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word 
29/09/2013 18:38
On condition for synthesis of meaning in word,  at conjecture is proposed  by the next result of etale cohomology.
Result
—————————————————--
Canonical natural equivalence 
The next two are left exact additional functors.
 A   ->  A’  
 A’  ->  A” 
 and  A’  have enough many injective objects.
If   transfers  A’  s injective object to  G  acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.
 (   O  F  ) =~  RG  O  RF .
—————————————————--
Conjecture
Preparation 
Word is shown by  . This word is called  old word .
Base meaning in word is shown by  .
Word that has base meaning is shown by  RF .
Additional meaning to word is shown by  .
Word that has additional meaning is shown by  RG . This word is called  intermediate word .
Word that has base meaning and additional meaning is shown by   (   O   ). This word is called  new word .
Conjecture 
For completion of new word, old word and intermediate word have the condition shown by the canonical natural equivalence of etale cohomology. 

3  Canonical natural equivalence 
29/09/2013 18:08
Canonical natural equivalence 
The next two are left exact additional functors.
 A   ->  A’  
 A’  ->  A” 
 and  A’  have enough many injective objects.
If   transfers  ‘s injective object to  G  acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.
 (   O  F  ) =~  RG  O  RF .

Source:  Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word / sekinanlatest 2013

Tokyo
1 May 2014
Sekinan Research Field of Language

...................................................................................................................................................................


6.
Three Conjectures containing Synthesis Conjecture are shown at the next.These conjectures are the latest result of language universals at Sekinan Research Field of Language.

  • Three Conjectures for Dimension, Synthesis and Reversion with Root and Supplement


Tokyo
21 December 2014
SILessay


Sayama Hills, Tokyo

Monday, 17 July 2017

Simone Weil's LA PESANTEUR ET LA GRACE again



Simone Weil's  LA PESANTEUR ET LA GRACE, Japanese translated edition has been published in March 2017.
What I first knew her name  was probably  in the high school days. The book was the simple biography.
After entering the university, I first totally read this book that gave me the deep impact on life and belief.
In the same time I read Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus which also  affected me great influence thinking of language.
Simone Weil taught me the importance of verticality, gravity downwards and grace upwards.
And now I have been newly taught algebra's holizontality.
She keeps on asking me " To where do you go ?  With what do you take?"
For the present I will go to universality and take with algebra.
But the road is far ahead or very high above, probably in eternal gravity.  

Juryoku to Oncho. Translated by FUKUHARA Mayumi. 2017. Iwanami Shoten Publishers.
Simone Weil's  LA PESANTEUR ET LA GRACE, 1947 Japanese translated edition.

References
  • Enchanted with language and mathematics
  1. Andre Martinet
  2. Charles Bally 
  3. Read Andre Weil 
  4. Bourbaki' ELEMENTS DE MATHEMATIUE Troisieme edition, 1964 
  5. The Time of Language Ode to The Early Bourbaki To Grothendieck  Note added 
  • Wandering between language and philosophy    
  1. For WITTGENSTEIN Revised / Position of Language / 10 December 2005 - 3 August 2012
  2. The Time of Wittgenstein /20 January 2012
  3. Citation from Ludwig Wittgenstein / 7 February 2012
  4. THE ROAD TO REALITY A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, 2005 by Roger Penrose / 25 October 2012       
  • Winding road to physics
  1.     Now I am Enough Old for Remembering the Past / 27 September 2012
  2.     To my dear friend, KANEKO Yutaka / 22 May 2013
  3.     Half farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague / 23 October 2013 
  4.     Perhaps Return to Physics /16 August 2014

Tokyo
28 June 2017
Sekinan Library

Sekinan Library / Theory 2003 - 2016

sekinan library tHEORY


2003
  1. On Time Property Inherent in Characters
2004
  1. Quantum Theory for Language
  2. Distance Theory
  3. Prague Theory
  4. Reversion Theory
  5. Mirror Theory
  6. Mirror Language
  7. Guarantee of Language
  8. Property of Quantum
  9. Quantification of Quantum
  10. Actual Language and Imaginary Language
  11. Guarantee of language
  12. Place where quantum of language exists
  13. Actual language and imaginary language
  14. Property of quantum
  15. Quantification of quantum  
  16. Direction
  17. Uniformity

2005
  1. Changeability
  2. Individuality
  3. Time
  4. Fixation
  5. Grammar
  6. Substantiality
  7. Frame
  8. Recognition
  9. Ideogram
  10. Conversation
  11. Descriptiveness
  12. Lineation
  13. System
  14. Automaton
  15. Vector
 2007
  1. Algebraic Linguistics
2008
  1. CLifford Algebra
  2. Energy Distance Theory
  3. Functional Analysis
  4. Holomorphic Meaning Theory
  5. Kac-Moody Lie Algebra 
  6. Operator Algebra
  7. Reversion Analysis Theory
  8. Stochastic Meaning Theory
  9. von Neumann Algebra
  10. Complex Manifold Deformation Theory 
2009
  1. Complex Manifold Deformation Theory
  2. Language Manifold Theory
  3. Topological Group Language Theory
  4. Symplectic Language Theory
  5. Floer Homology Language
  6. Arithmetic Geometry Language
2011
  1. Imaginary Language
  2. Notes for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej
  3. Time of WANG Guowei
  4. Stable and Unstable of Language
2012
  1. Projective Space Model
  2. Diophantine Language
  3. Hyperbolic Language
  4. Grassmann Language
  5. Grassmann Language 2
  6. Birational Language
  7. Dual Language
  8. Infinite Loop Space Language
2013
  1. Homotopy Language         
  2. Operad Meaning Theory
  3. Arithmetic Geometry Language 2
2014
  1.  Algebraic Geometry Language 
2015
  1. Flow, Time and Dimension of Language
  2. Energy of language
2016
  1. Derived Category Language


SEKINAN LIBRARY / FRESH