Sunday, 8 March 2026

Conversation

 312


Conversation



1 Automaton of language is shown by the free conversation between two.
2 Here an example of automaton is presented, conversation between a guide (automaton speaker) and a visitor to A town.
3 Sequence is shown below.
1) A guide has proper information of A town.
2) He (guide) has personality. – I like this town, because there is a splendid hill containing many living being such as birds, butterfly, trees, flowers and so forth.
3) He has <frame> of language. <Frame> is a type of a dictionary, for example like Collins Dictionary which has always renewed vocabulary, named Collins Internet dictionary. 
4) He always generates <quantum> from <frame>.
5) A visitor questions. –Where am I?
6) He (guide) thinks about the question. 
7) The question is analyzed by him.
   [where]  “Questionable information”
   [am]    “Inflectional information”
   [I]      “Definite information”
8) He answers like below.
   “Definite info.” <from I to you>    -You
   “Inflectional info.” <from am to are>    -are
   “Questionable info.”  <from where to clock tower>    -at clock tower.
9) [At] is inserted from his(guide) dictionary’s <grammar>.
10) –You are at clock tower. This expression is <quantum> which needs energy for dynamism.
4 <Quantum>’s energy is prepared by electricity, for example a kind of voltage, difference of which makes different digital information to others.
5 In automaton of language, all of language is sent by the form of <quantum>.
6 <Quantum> is a set of units which consists of a finite number.
7 Each <quantum> has a closed information. <Quantum> is in a fixed condition.
8 Change of language is expressed by the distance and movement of <quantum>.
9 Quanta, a set of <quantum>s is finite. Therefore All of quanta can be descriptive.
10 <Descriptiveness> is essential for <Quantum Theory for Language>.
11 <Descriptiveness> will be presented by the new Essay in a short while.



TOKYO March 7, 2005


Ideogram

 311


Ideogram



1 <Ideogram> is a unit for <frame> of language.
2 <Ideogram> is a figure which has two parts, <meaning> and <grammar>.
3 As a figure, <ideogram> is recognized in an instant.
4 <Ideogram> generates <quantum> in <system>.
5 Now there are 5 <ideogram>s, namely, [ I, meet, he, library, yesterday].
6 There becomes <quantum>, namely, / I meet he library yesterday. /
7 New <quantum> returns to <ideogram> .
8 New <ideogram>s are 6, [ I, meet. he. library, yesterday, I meet he library yesterday ].
9 There add 3<ideogram>s. [met, him, at].
10 New <quantum> is generated, / I met him at library yesterday. / .
11 <Ideogram> is static and fixed but <quantum> is dynamic and changeable.
12 <Quantum> needs energy for its dynamism but does not need dynamic devices.
13 <Ideogram> resembles Nintendo’s FAMICON, but differs in the following 14-18.
14 <Ideogram> is a source of <language>.
14 <Ideogram> is a part of automatic language generating machine.
15 <Ideogram> is a figure which is scanned and reproduced easily.
16 <Ideogram>’s inputting devices are various, such as typing, voice inputting, manual writing, pictograph and so forth. 
17 <Ideogram> can install to language-answering-devices, such as telephone, vending machine, showing-way-machine and so forth. Answer is always individually different for the most adequate purpose.
18 <Ideogram>’s <grammar> is possible to be written as a sophisticated figure which is transformed to easy-readable style.
19 <Ideogram>’s <meaning> is enlarged by the adding-from-old-to-new system. See upper No.5-10.



TOKYO March 4, 2005


Recognition

 310


Recognition



1 Language consists of static <frame> and dynamic <quantum>.
2 When <frame> is recognized by <energy>, <quantum> begins moving.
3 <Energy> is inputted through human or electrical power.
4 <Frame> has <element>s which give information to <quantum>.
5 <Element>s generate <quantum> in a language <system>.
6 <System> has several coordinate axes.
7 <Quantum>’s location is determined by coordinate values.
8 <Frame> and <quantum> make a pair.
9 <Frame> is a figure which contains information to generate <quantum>.
10 <Quantum> is a unit of composite which contains <meaning> and <grammar>.
11 <Frame> is the source material of language, but not language itself.
12<Frame> keeps a fixed condition and is possible to move.
13 <Frame> resembles bar code, but differs in the following 14-21.
14 <Frame> has independent information of a set of <meaning> and <grammar>.  
15 <Frame> is static and fixed, but generates dynamic <quantum> in <system>.
16 Now <frame> is expressed by [ ], and <quantum> is expressed by / /.
17 For example, when I make one new <frame> [ I go school yesterday], <quantum> is generated to / I went to school yesterday/ by <meaning> and <grammar> in information of <frame>.
18 <Quantum> is one of automatic language generating machine from functional view.
19 Ideally <frame> should be recognized in an instant by optical condition.
20 <Frame> should be made as a set of <ideogram>.
21 <Ideogram> has <vocabulary> and <dictionary> as a form of enlarged <meaning> and <grammar>.
22 One application of this concept is thinkable for hospital.
23 Medical charts are a <frame>. Charts are rewritten daily. Rewritten work is a <quantum>. <Quantum> is fixed in an instant to another <frame>.
24 <Frame>-<quantum> flow chart resembles a current computer system, but differs in the following 25-30.
25 Recognition of <frame> is done under a fixed condition, and do not use dynamic device.
26 Movement of <quantum> is done under simple <energy> system using inputting device.
27 Result of <quantum> is remained as a new <frame>.     
28 <Quantum> will move on a little device, not the current computer.
29 Devices do not use dynamic methods, excluding inputting device.
30 All system is basically put under solid condition.   



TOKYO March 4, 2005



Prague Theory Prague Theory 2 About Language Machine

 309




Prague Theory 2
About Language Machine


1
Language machine is assumed to a device of automatic generating language.
2
In this phase, <automatic> means the orderly arranged output against random occurred input.
3
The relationship between input and output is obeyed by a digitized quantified logic.
4
The logic is in accord with the principles and rules on <Quantum Theory for Language>.
5
In the machine, automatism contains the generation of linking language usually called copula.
6
For example, [ I ] and [ student ] is inputted, the output is [[ I am student]]. In the output, [[ am ]] is newly generated in the language machine. 
Mark [ is a sign of input starting.
Mark ] is a sign of input ending.
Mark [[ is a sign of output starting.
Mark ]] is a sign of output ending.
7
Now [I], [student] and [March] are inputted, the output becomes [[I will be student in March]].
In this situation, [will be] and [in] are newly generated.
8
<Time principle of quantum> is the most radical theory for <Prague Theory>.
The principle is abbreviated to TPQ.
9
<Reversion principle of quantum> is contributed to <Guarantee of Language>.
The principle is abbreviated to RPQ.
10
TPQ and RPQ contain the longitude of time.
11
The time of TPQ is classified to the static one.
It is a width of the time on body clock of the quantum.
The time of RTQ is classified to the dynamic one.
It is a progress of the time on outer quantum.
12
Newly generated parts of language are linking language of different floor of <Quantum Theory for Language>.
Each floor has an orbit of quanta.
13
For example, in [[I am student]], [[I]] and [[student]] are placed to the different floors.
Two floors are linked by the copula [[am]].
14
The selection of suitable copula is operated by the inner information of each quantum and combination of two or over two quanta on the orbit.


Tokyo October 17, 2004

​Ideogram Paper

 308

​Ideogram Paper




1. Ideogram 2005



Read more: https://geometrization-language.webnode.com/

Egyptian Hieroglyph Exhibition Journey through the Afterlife Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead by The British Museum 2012

 307

Egyptian Hieroglyph Exhibition Journey through the Afterlife Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead by The British Museum 2012



TANAKA Akio
               
                         

The British Museum has exhibited The ancient Egypt at Tokyo, titled Journey through the Afterlife Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead.
The exhibition is excellent, especially total length 37 meters' Greenfield Papyrus is the highlight of the exhibit.


I feel over again that the letters on the papyrus is almost everlasting and my usual thought that the letters are superior than the spoken language which is thought important by Ferdinand Saussure.
Of course I have respected Saussure so much and have read COURS DE LINGUISTIQUE GENERALE time to time.
But the Occidental linguistics has not enough tradition on the ideogram as usual at Chinese characters.


Japan has also succeeded the Chinese tradition and culture. So we have much felt the importance on characters and letters.
Each ideogram has its unique molding technique and coinage ability.
I have very satisfied with hieroglyph's figures comparison to Chinese characters.

Also refer to the next.
 
  1. On Time Property Inherent in Characters / 2003
  2. Prague Theory / 2004


                                                                  Tokyo
                                                         12 September 2012

                                       Sekinan Research Field of Language


Read more: https://srfl-lab.webnode.com/products/egyptian-hieroglyph-exhibition-journey-through-the-afterlife-ancient-egyptian-book-of-the-dead-by-the-british-museum/

Essence of Language Seeing the exhibition TREASURES OF ANCIENT GREECE, Tokyo National Museum 306

 

Essence of Language Seeing the exhibition TREASURES OF ANCIENT GREECE, Tokyo National Museum



TANAKA Akio

20 July 2016 I went to see the exhibition A JOURNEY TO THE IMMORTALS: TREASURES OF ANCIENT GREECE being opened at Tokyo National Museum, Ueno,Tokyo.

At the exhibition I first saw  Linear A and Linear B.
Exhibition Catalogue numbers are the next.
The numbers 39 and 40 are Linear A. 41 and 77 are Linear B. 

39. Clay juglet
40. Clay bar
41. Clay tablet
77. Linear B bar and tablet

 About the two Linear I knew the brief information from the book, THE DECIPHERMENT OF LINEAR B by John Chadwick, Cambridge University Press, 1960.
From the exhibition I also knew still now not to decipher the Linear A.
My simple impression  is the next.
If the stability of language exist in the structure, the essence of language is appeared at the letters and characters. So I think. The core of this view contains the view for structure of language, which I would be able to write clearly using mathematics. 
For more details, refer to the reference 2.


References
A JOURNEY TO THE IMMORTALS: TREASURES OF ANCIENT GREECE  [Exhibition Catalogue]. Tokyo National Museum et al. 2016.
THE DECIPHERMENT OF LINEAR B by John Chadwick, Cambridge University Press, 1960.

Reference 2
Perspective for Derived Category Language.Stability of Language

Reference 3
Derived Category Language, 23 July 2016 Edition


Tokyo
27 July 2016
SekinanLibrary

Read more: http://srfl-paper.webnode.com/news/the-essence-of-language/